Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

You can come up with better than that...

by tilly (Archbishop)
on Dec 06, 2001 at 01:34 UTC ( #129769=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to (Ovid) Re: Frivolous function names
in thread Frivolous function names

I know you can...
  • Comment on You can come up with better than that...

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://129769]
help
Chatterbox?
[cbeckley]: It's nascent, and probably looks like baby Perl to the veterans.
[cbeckley]: I have several questions about it's future development. But it seems like a lot of code to put in a sopw.
[cbeckley]: Should I put the module and example calling code in cufp, and then ask questions in sopw?
[haukex]: You can put it in SOPW, but use <readmore> tags
[haukex]: Also you might want to label it "code review"
[haukex]: Unless you have specific questions, in which case SSCCE's are much better

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (12)
As of 2017-03-24 15:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?



    Results (304 votes). Check out past polls.