Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re: do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?

by dws (Chancellor)
on Jan 03, 2002 at 22:45 UTC ( #136037=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?

I really like it, and am likely to abandon the for(;;) construct permanently in favor of the above idiom. Should I repent?

One of the tradeoffs you'll need to consider when making this decision is whether readability suffers when your loop gets to be more than an eyefull. A non-loop scope is a common idiom, particularly when the intent it to temporarily localize variables. When I read

{ local $/ = undef; ...
I think to myself, "ah, slurp mode," not "I wonder if this is going to be a loop?" I then read on with a mental context set. But if 15 lines down I enounter last or redo, I have a moment of confusion to work through that wouldn't have been there if the scope had started with   while ( 1 ) {
or   for ( ; ; ) {


Comment on Re: do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://136037]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-07-30 01:39 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (269 votes), past polls