Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Why are closures cool, continued?

by mr.dunstan (Monk)
on Jan 19, 2002 at 04:11 UTC ( #140011=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Why are closures cool, continued?

Ok how about this: true or false (the author of the very first example in this thread and I were talking thru what constitutes this) ...

"A closure is different from an anonymous subroutine in that (instead of having private variables) it -saves- the variables passed into it in its scope!"

This seems like a reasonable enough and perfectly clear statement, but to be honest anytime I think something is reasonable and clear, that's when I'm about to start being REALLY wrong! :)

-mr.dunstan


Comment on Re: Why are closures cool, continued?
Re: Re: Why are closures cool, continued?
by perrin (Chancellor) on Jan 19, 2002 at 06:36 UTC
    Closure and anonymous sub -- two totally different things! An anonymous sub is a ref to a sub without a name. A closure is any sub (named or not) that refers to lexical variables defined outside of its scope.
      Nearly. An anonymous sub is a sub without a name that can only be accessed via a reference (to that sub).

      --
      g r i n d e r
      print@_{sort keys %_},$/if%_=split//,'= & *a?b:e\f/h^h!j+n,o@o;r$s-t%t#u';

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://140011]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-07-03 00:10 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (47 votes), past polls