Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much

Re: Re: Death to Dot Star!

by Anonymous Monk
on Feb 27, 2002 at 04:49 UTC ( #147811=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Death to Dot Star!
in thread Death to Dot Star!

you seem to have missed the point and all the nodes in this thread, not good

Comment on Re: Re: Death to Dot Star!
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Death to Dot Star!
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 27, 2002 at 16:46 UTC
    I posted this as a tip to the readers of this thread. The audience is people who aren't too fluent with regexes, and the regex for matching the question is perhaps tough for beginners. I merely wanted to point out that you don't always have to use that cumbersome and easy-to-slip-with solution. And yes, I understand that it was for educational purposes.

    The task was to get rid of .*?'s in this case unwanted behaviour. That is what my solution does. I don't see why this solution doesn't fit into the thread as nicely as Ovid's regex.

    I was a bit sparse with words in my previous post, but I had no intention to devalue Ovid's node. I think it's great. I just wanted to share an idea that was applyable to the problem Ovid was solving.

Re: Re: Re: Death to Dot Star!
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 05, 2002 at 04:27 UTC
    The following article is about using reverse regular expressions, or sexgers (snicker). Its purpose it to increase efficency by avoiding the lookahead mechanism. Todd W.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://147811]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2015-10-09 01:54 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    Does Humor Belong in Programming?

    Results (232 votes), past polls