Re: Plural variable naming (or not?)

[cjf]

I follow naming conventions roughly similar Juerd and simon.proctor.

Scalars should be singular, it really throws me off when they're not, $fields just really doesn't look right. Arrays should always be plural. Hashes on the other hand, I'm fairly indifferent about, but I tend to lean towards singular $field{name}. I think this looks a bit better than $fields{name} but it does depend somewhat on what it's being used for.

[tachyon]

Does this look right? Accessing a plural array for a singular element

my @replies = ( 'so', 'plurals', { 'you' => 'think?' } );
my $answer = $replies[2]->{you};
print $answer;

[cjf]

Actually, yes, it does :)

It might only appear right to me because I've become accustomed to doing it that way. I do see your point, but I still find plural array names feel more natural than singular ones:

my @reply = qw/a singular array name? how odd/;
my $cannotnamethisreply = $reply[5];
print $cannotnamethisreply;

Now that looks stranger to me than using a plural for the array name and a singular for the related scalar. I can understand either view though. :)

[thelenm]

Scalars should be singular, it really throws me off when they're not, $fields just really doesn't look right.

I agree with you on that one, although sometimes I will use a plural scalar if it's a named reference to an array, e.g.

$fields = [1, 2, 3];

That also helps me to remember that it's not a "normal" scalar, but that it's really referring to something plural.