Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Plural variable naming (or not?)

by nefertari (Chaplain)
on Mar 20, 2002 at 09:51 UTC ( #152944=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Plural variable naming (or not?)
in thread Plural variable naming (or not?)

No, you aren't: Some names (i often name variables in german, or mix the languages, this i should change!):
@mathsylist : a name for a list in that i store the recent mathsymbols.
%preprintliste : the matching preprints, stored as a hash, in order to avoid trouble with doubleentries in two files.
@sortierteschluessel: this is plural (sorted keys) for exactly that.
It seems that i either use plural or something like list in the end.


Comment on Re: Re: Plural variable naming (or not?)
Re(3): Plural variable naming (or not?)
by FoxtrotUniform (Prior) on Mar 21, 2002 at 20:34 UTC

    Interesting... I'd have thought that @plural would be more intuitive than @singular_list. Obviously, your mileage varies.

    The one place I can see where this would be a distinct advantage is when you're using Perl arrays as different data types. For instance:

    my @foo_list; my @bar_stack; my @baz_queue; my @xyzzy_heap;

    If these were just plurals, it would be impossible to tell just from the names which one was a stack, or a queue, or whatever -- which could be a very bad thing.

    --
    :wq

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://152944]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-07-04 03:20 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (57 votes), past polls