Re: Style geekcode

[buckaduck]

in reply to Style geekcode

Looking at the codes submitted already, I'm nervously hoping that there are other weirdos like me out there... But here goes:

I2t! Os1 ;0 S,><.><+><**><=><&&><and>++<gt><==> B1
L1 C1 P0 N< R1 Vc1a1p(s-1h0a1)r1d1 Hsw2 main-sub

Update: Well as long as we're all being picky, it's a shame that I can't specify NO spaces around an operator. That's why I'm leaving out the ++ operator unless this gets clarified some more. Also, I'm choosing "dummy" variables even though these are more typically "temp".

buckaduck

[Juerd]

it's a shame that I can't specify NO spaces around an operator.

You can!! Just have the operator without "<" or ">". Your code would be:


S,><.><+><**><=><&&><and>++<gt><==>

I'll add a bit of clarification to the root node

U28geW91IGNhbiBhbGwgcm90MTMgY
W5kIHBhY2soKS4gQnV0IGRvIHlvdS
ByZWNvZ25pc2UgQmFzZTY0IHdoZW4
geW91IHNlZSBpdD8gIC0tIEp1ZXJk

[buckaduck]

In your example, how do you distinguish between these?

++   <gt>
++<   gt>

Update: Apparently he does it by reading the specs more carefully than I did. My bad.

buckaduck

[Juerd]

In your example, how do you distinguish between these?

++   <gt>
++<   gt>

You don't have to. Both mean:

• No space with ++
• A space on both sides of comparison operators (except for ==)
Valid ++ codes are:

++
<++  # These three
++>  # have the
<++> # same meaning

So with "++<", the less-than sign is always part of the expression that comes after ++.

U28geW91IGNhbiBhbGwgcm90MTMgY
W5kIHBhY2soKS4gQnV0IGRvIHlvdS
ByZWNvZ25pc2UgQmFzZTY0IHdoZW4
geW91IHNlZSBpdD8gIC0tIEp1ZXJk