Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Scoping issue when sorting with subroutines

by broquaint (Abbot)
on Apr 12, 2002 at 15:49 UTC ( #158614=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Scoping issue when sorting with subroutines
in thread Scoping issue when sorting with subroutines

> Keep in mind that perl currently doesn't do nested subs
Ack, how un-DWIM!

sub foo { my $x = "a var in foo()"; sub bar { print "\$x is - [$x]\n"; } } bar(); __output__ $x is - []
But if we use a closure, all is well with the scope of $x
sub foo { my $x = "a var in foo()"; return sub { print "\$x is - [$x]\n"; } } foo()->(); __output__ $x is - [a var in foo()]
I was vaguely aware of the fact that nested subs in perl were broken (i.e scoped to current package, not current sub) and now I know the full extent (but I guess the logic should've followed really). Oh well, not much longer til Perl6 anyway ...
HTH

broquaint


Comment on Re: Re: Scoping issue when sorting with subroutines
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://158614]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-10-26 01:03 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (149 votes), past polls