Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks RobOMonk
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Are we obsessed with CGI?

by bikeNomad (Priest)
on Apr 14, 2002 at 23:26 UTC ( #159037=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Are we obsessed with CGI?

This is something I've noticed on Perl Monks for some time.

Since I don't do CGIs if I can help it, Perl's capabilities in that realm are irrelevant to me.

However, Perl is a good general-purpose language. It's also fun to do language experimentation (see Class::Prototyped for example).

I have an article coming out in Embedded Linux Journal that describes a data acquisition system for scientists in the field; this embedded system uses Perl for its data acquisition, queries, network connectivity, administration (via Webmin), etc. One thing that made Perl better than (say) C in this system was eval "string": to add a new kind of data channel to the system you give the system a small chunk of Perl code that acts as glue between the data acquisition scheduler and the particular sensor or computation you're logging. These can get added at runtime without bringing down the system, without explicit compilation, and they're typically only a few lines.

Though there were a few CGIs in the system (for configuration), the bulk of the work was done by Event.pm and BerkeleyDB.


Comment on Re: Are we obsessed with CGI?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://159037]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-04-18 05:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (462 votes), past polls