Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: Writing a web message board from scratch

by tomazos (Deacon)
on Apr 19, 2002 at 14:32 UTC ( #160556=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: Writing a web message board from scratch
in thread Writing a web message board from scratch

Interesting. So essentially you are suggesting the best way to start would be to write a small and simple program and then build that up to the large program by adding on a bit at a time.

I've noticed that a lot of programmers disagree on this point. Some suggest the best way to do it is to work on the big picture "on paper" and then keeping refining that until the final code "falls out".

I've never seen that method actually in practice, but I have an open mind.


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Writing a web message board from scratch
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Writing a web message board from scratch
by Molt (Chaplain) on Apr 19, 2002 at 14:49 UTC

    As I said, different methodologies work for different people. Have a read through some Software Engineering texts, see what they have to say.

    The start-small and build out is part of a lightweight methology called Extreme Programming, and really relies on the unit testing concept in my opinion to keep it sane.

    The start with the big picture and keep refining it is stepwise refinement. I have used it on some things in the past, and even now I do use it when there's a part of a task that I don't feel the XP approach.

    Some people I know do seem to be able to pretty much pull large systems fully-formed from their forehead.

    Ultimately it's a question of what works for you, however. Asking any software engineer which methodology works best is like asking a programmer which language is best, you're going to get a few differing answers. Bookshelves are straining under the weight of software engineering textbooks, I don't know which to recommend since the field has moved on a lot since I last bought one of them.

    If you're unsure I'd recommend going for something heavyweight such as full stepwise-refinement, entity-relationship diagrams, user-stories, and so on. The reason for this is it's easier to think 'This is overkill' and tone down than to suddenly go 'Eep, I'm losing myself in this' and get more stringent.

    TMTOWTDI, sound familiar?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://160556]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-10-20 21:27 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (92 votes), past polls