Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: Chatterbox abuse and possible remedies

by mcwee (Pilgrim)
on Jun 03, 2000 at 01:53 UTC ( #16142=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: Chatterbox abuse and possible remedies
in thread Chatterbox abuse and possible remedies

I dunno about auto-banning-- that sounds like it could get out of hand pretty quickly. (I mean, I could be a real putz one day and find myself booted on the basis of one day when everyone just had to ignor my crazy-talk.)

The Autonomic Pilot


Comment on RE: RE: Chatterbox abuse and possible remedies
RE: RE: RE: Chatterbox abuse and possible remedies
by BigJoe (Curate) on Jun 03, 2000 at 02:52 UTC
    The Ignore feature is really good. I think if a ban feature would be implemented that it could only be done by a very high level like saints or something. Also that the ban is like a hold period where after a day or to they could try again. And maybe the more they get banned the longer it is in effect.

    Update : It would also be helpful to see who you have on ignore (incase if you want to actually talk to them).

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://16142]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-07-31 04:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (244 votes), past polls