Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: Chatterbox abuse and possible remedies

by BBQ (Deacon)
on Jun 03, 2000 at 19:54 UTC ( #16194=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: Chatterbox abuse and possible remedies
in thread Chatterbox abuse and possible remedies

I don't think the /ban idea is bad, but the method of delegating ban power could be revised. Delegating the right to impede free speach is serious business. I'd only give it out to monks that have proven to be reasonable and well tempered. I beleive that this has nothing to do with the number of write-ups or XPs. I have seen very XPed monks put down newbies in the chatterbox, and I beleive that wouldn't be a case of /ban. Ignore, maybe!

Also, any user that does get /ban powers shouldn't be able to ignore, or else s/he might not see a user that s/he has ignored previously is abuseing the chatterbox. just my R$0.02 as usual...

#!/home/bbq/bin/perl
# Trust no1!


Comment on RE: RE: Chatterbox abuse and possible remedies

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://16194]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-07-31 17:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (249 votes), past polls