good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
RE: Chatterbox abuse and possible remediesby mt2k (Hermit) |
on Jun 03, 2000 at 22:16 UTC ( [id://16208]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I completely agree with most of the users here. The /ignore feature is absolutely a good idea, though it is sad to have to use it. I don't believe that a /ban feature is needed at the moment, since it has only been one incident. And if it becomes a more common occurance on this site (chatterbox abuse), which I don't think will happen, a /ban could be implimented. Besides, how many users currently use this site? And only 1 abused the chatterbox? And now vroom is going through all this work because of one jerk? I say leave it alone for now (keep the /ignore though) and see how everything goes. One jerk shouldn't have this site putting up all kinds of new features to stop it. And has masturbator even been here in a while? Seems jjhorner really scared the hell out of him! :-) Summary: At this time, I think: But then, this is just the opinion of a scribe :)
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|