Re: Re: Idiomatic optimizations

[sfink]

in reply to Re: Idiomatic optimizations
in thread Idiomatic optimizations

What perl are you using? Those should be identical at runtime, since interpolation is converted to concatenation by the tokenizer. For evidence, try:

% perl -MO=Deparse -e '$foo=q(foo)'
$foo = 'foo';
-e syntax OK
% perl -MO=Deparse -e '$foo=qq(foo)'
$foo = 'foo';
-e syntax OK

I ran your benchmark program, and got +/- 3%. Try running it a few times.

[BlueLines]

I was logged in remotely to my home machine when i ran this, which means that xscreensaver was running with 100% of my cpu (yay OpenGL). I ran the test again without xscreensaver and i got the same results you did. oh well.

BlueLines

Disclaimer: This post may contain inaccurate information, be habit forming, cause atomic warfare between peaceful countries, speed up male pattern baldness, interfere with your cable reception, exile you from certain third world countries, ruin your marriage, and generally spoil your day. No batteries included, no strings attached, your mileage may vary.

[Sifmole]

I wonder if the results have anything to do with you using q instead of a single quote and qq instead of double quotes.