|P is for Practical|
Re: Re: Random Samplingby demerphq (Chancellor)
|on Jun 26, 2002 at 11:15 UTC||Need Help??|
Well, to be honest I think your criticism should be aimed at the way I presented the algorithm (mostly as "proof of concept") than the algorithm itself.
For instance it would work just fine for a picking N elelements from a file of known arbitrarily large size, regardless of fixed record or not, and of media restrictions (for instance it would work fine for data stroed on a tape).
Whereas the algorithm you mention (and thanks :-) needs to have the full set in memory at one time, or efficient random access to the records as stored on some form of fixed media (which afaict would require fixed record lengths).
I realize this criticism applys to my implementation as well, since I used an array. Clearly I shouldnt have as it distracts from the point I was making. :-)
Thanks for the comments though, added value for the thread for sure.
Ass u me is a bad thing...
Yves / DeMerphq