Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: Simple Construction of a RAW TCP/IP Packet.

by cleen (Pilgrim)
on Jun 13, 2000 at 04:08 UTC ( #17819=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: Simple Construction of a RAW TCP/IP Packet.
in thread Simple Construction of a RAW TCP/IP Packet.

The fact is, perl is the bomb, I havnt really been given a good example why C is so much better then perl, Ive heard people say it, but never been given a REASONABLE example, they claim efficiency, less process time, bah, in either case, if the programmer doesnt know what they are doing they are going to be in-efficient. Reality: Perl can be faster, and more efficient then C if it is written properly.

on a side note, I am in the process of writing more raw socket examples for perl monks, IE constructing ICMP packets (what I am currently working on), to even constructing multicast packets...Its really fun to do, really it is :)

-cleen


Comment on RE: RE: Simple Construction of a RAW TCP/IP Packet.
RE: RE: RE: Simple Construction of a RAW TCP/IP Packet.
by JanneVee (Friar) on Jun 13, 2000 at 16:38 UTC
    I'm just waiting to see and excited to see the end result of that. Crazy idea: a traceroute perlscript!
Re: RE: RE: Simple Construction of a RAW TCP/IP Packet.
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 12, 2003 at 13:24 UTC
    you really do a great job. i'm looking forward to some work for same thing. can i communicate with you by email? Thanks my email:toy1@21cn.com name: haijun nation: China

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://17819]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-10-01 18:24 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    What is your favourite meta-syntactic variable name?














    Results (32 votes), past polls