Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer

Re: Re^3: Problems with String::Parity;

by dwatson06 (Friar)
on Jul 02, 2002 at 17:56 UTC ( #178929=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: Problems with String::Parity;
in thread Problems with String::Parity;

Yes, Just, after the numerous subs (setEvenParity, setOddParity, showParity, EvenBytes & OddBytes). This one is the EDQ right before the 5 subs. I have replaced it with the pm from CPAN. They are the same. Is there a modification I could make there?
I'm a little lost on this statement.
eval <<EDQ;
  • Comment on Re: Re^3: Problems with String::Parity;

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re^3: Problems with String::Parity;
by dwatson06 (Friar) on Jul 02, 2002 at 18:26 UTC
    I got it. I'm embarrased to say what it was though.;) Thank you.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://178929]
[haukex]: You can put it in SOPW, but use <readmore> tags
[haukex]: Also you might want to label it "code review"
[haukex]: Unless you have specific questions, in which case SSCCE's are much better
[cbeckley]: Excellent, thank you.
[cbeckley]: CUFP is more appropriate for stuff that's finished^h^h^h^h more advanced state of completeness?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (11)
As of 2017-03-24 15:08 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

    Results (304 votes). Check out past polls.