Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine

RE: Seeing who gives you a positive on a post

by muppetBoy (Pilgrim)
on Jun 14, 2000 at 12:29 UTC ( #18058=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Seeing who gives you a positive on a post

I think voting should definitely be kept anonymous for all of the reasons it is in the real world. The monastery is a peaceful place and I would hate to see that spoiled by a 'Monk War' sparked off by seeing someone persistantly voting you down.
The knowledge of who votes you up or down can/will affect your opinion of that person and how you react to them in the future. We could see a group of monks just voting for each others posts - which mould make a mockery of the XP system. I'm not saying everyone would behave like that but a minority probably would.
A better solution would be, as has been suggested, to send a msg to the author or post a reply if you think what you've got to say would be of interest to other monks. IMHO, a reply should only be sent if it contains useful information, not just a "You're great" or "You suck" message as this will just decrease the S/N ratio.
  • Comment on RE: Seeing who gives you a positive on a post

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://18058]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (14)
As of 2016-10-27 14:35 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?

    Results (364 votes). Check out past polls.