Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: On Responsible Considerations

by Aristotle (Chancellor)
on Jul 11, 2002 at 20:45 UTC ( #181143=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to On Responsible Considerations

I couldn't agree more with basically all of the post and have on occasion /msg'd monks when I thought their consideration was inappropriate, with a few pointers such as to aforementioned FAQ. My only question is with regards to:

Please do not request that the replies be re-parented just so a bad node can be reaped. That changes history....we don't like that.

What I would like to know is inhowfar that extends to replies to true duplicate root nodes. In such cases I frequently go back and consider the (usually very few) replies for reparenting to the good root node, reasoning that putting the replies back in context preserves their searchability value. As an irrelevant bonus, the reaped node is then free to silently slip into the bit bucket.

Is that bad?

Makeshifts last the longest.


Comment on Re: On Responsible Considerations
(tye)Re: On Responsible Considerations
by tye (Cardinal) on Jul 12, 2002 at 21:43 UTC

    Yes, reparenting a node from one true duplicate to the other is fine. I believe footpad is talking about reparenting from:

    Some random node `--- A regretted reply `--- An informative reply
    to
    Some random node `--- An informative reply
    which is something I don't want to see.

            - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://181143]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-08-23 01:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (170 votes), past polls