Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine

Re: why a nodelet can be kept against the authors wish?

by Rex(Wrecks) (Curate)
on Jul 12, 2002 at 16:44 UTC ( #181339=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to why a nodelet can be kept agains author wish?

Tye is exactly right on this. One of the only nodes I have with negative XP is one of the nodes I learned the most on. tilly corrected me on basic error handling, and our (tilly and I) ensuing conversation via CB ended up changing one of my mindsets and made me a better coder. I left it in that state as a reminder to me, and an example to any other learning monk that might benifit from tilly rightfully scorching me on simple issue.

The other issue I have is that I saw an interesting title today: eWeek article on open source, however the node did not reference where the other article was. I eventually found it, but a quick edit that said, "Posted earlier, see A Published Special Report on Open Source and Perl Justifications for enterprises" would have made life much easier.

There are reasons for reaping, but I believe as Tye does, to much is being reaped and deleted which does not allow others to learn from the posters mistakes.

"Nothing is sure but death and taxes" I say combine the two and its death to all taxes!

Comment on Re: why a nodelet can be kept against the authors wish?

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://181339]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-11-30 02:57 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (756 votes), past polls