Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer

Re: Re: Re: DBI specification change

by bronto (Priest)
on Jul 16, 2002 at 15:58 UTC ( #182124=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: DBI specification change
in thread DBI specification change

You got a point here.

My reply, anyway, was triggered by this paragraph of gmax posting...

I am posting this warning because I have seen some SOPWs where people were using this particular idiom.

...and triggered that consideration of mine, which is general and not limited to DBI, that version n.m+1 shouldn't break any code that works with n.m. In case something could be broken, one should choose a new M>>m, obviously IMHO. No attempt to blame to DBI people there ;-)


Update: Edited the HTML, misplaced tag

# Another Perl edition of a song:
# The End, by The Beatles
  $you->take($love) eq $you->made($love) ;

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://182124]
NodeReaper duct tapes the vents to muffle the moaning

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (4)
As of 2017-08-21 16:21 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Who is your favorite scientist and why?

    Results (324 votes). Check out past polls.