Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Further Chatterbox improvements

by swiftone (Curate)
on Jun 15, 2000 at 21:23 UTC ( #18329=monkdiscuss: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

This is not an attack, as vroom has done quite a bit to make our Chatterbox experience better and better, but rather a list of ideas of what future improvements could be added.

One particular one I thought of would be to intercept any inputs beginning with /foo when foo is not understood. Thus /msg and /ignore would work, but /msh would come back to the input line along with a msg from root "/msh not understood".

This was inpired after seeing a serious of such typos...some intential, some not. (Those trying for the funny "typos" could still figure a way around it. \msg or .msg or whatever, the idea is to prevent mistakes that could prove highly embarassing.)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: Further Chatterbox improvements
by muppetBoy (Pilgrim) on Jun 16, 2000 at 12:23 UTC
    I wouldn't have thought that this would really be necessary. IMHO the chatterbox is just a quick way of getting some realtime(ish) communtication with other monks.
    A different channel of communication (email/ICQ etc) would probably be a better medium to communicate embarassing/confidential information on.
    I think it would be great to see different chatrooms/threaded conversations etc. but its probably beyond the remit of this site. A perl related IRC would be a better bet.
      Funny you should mention that...

      I registered a #PerlMonks channel on SlashNET a few days ago. It's generally only available when I'm logged in (and I haven't set up a bot to keep it running), but it's available.

      Does that suit you?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: monkdiscuss [id://18329]
Approved by root
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: might be it is necessary to pass the pic data like MIME::Base64:: encode( data..
[Discipulus]: if you have a jpeg data: or as wise Corion said IM ca n read directly your handle
[Corion]: Meh. I get the feeling I should post a call-to-action for people to test their modules with the upcoming 5.26 (or 5.25.latest), as it seems that the smoke testers don't really weed out modules that fail without . in @INC
[Corion]: But without instructions on how to easily test things yourself, I don't think such a call to arms is helpful
[Corion]: (this post on nntp.perl.org / p5p makes it seem to me that smoke testers seem to have a blind spot there)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (8)
As of 2017-03-27 08:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?



    Results (317 votes). Check out past polls.