Re: In this poll, I

[Chmrr]

in reply to In this poll, I

I would like to officially go on the record as one of the (currently) 2 people who voted for option 3 or above, "mu," which accounts for the totals not adding up. I realized that if I voted "I voted," it would be wrong because I had not voted at the time I clicked vote. On the flip side, it would clearly be untruthful to vote that I had not voted, as then I would have done so, thus forcing me to change my vote.

Hence how I arrived at the decision that I had only two choices -- to vote that I had halfway voted, or to unask the question.

perl -pe '"I lo*`+$^X$\"$]!$/"=~m%(.*)%s;$_=$1;y^`+*^e v^#$&V"+@( NO CARRIER'

[theorbtwo]

Since apparently people didn't quite get • Re(5): In this poll, I (my 200th post!) (which wasn't the 5th-level reply, and wasn't by Merlyn), I'm the other one.

And if you didn't get the reference, you might want to read about Russell's Paradox to destroy the basis of set theory.

Update: Changed the second paragraph, after actualy doing the search I recommended, and getting nothing good.

Update2: Corrected the spelling of Russell.

---

Confession: It does an Immortal Body good.

[Anonymous Monk]

I love perl 5.006001!