Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: On timely destruction?

by PhiRatE (Monk)
on Aug 29, 2002 at 23:40 UTC ( #193949=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: On timely destruction?
in thread On timely destruction?

I have one, although it isn't in perl (C++), which makes a connection to an HL7/DICOM broker. The broker will only support 1 tcp connection at a time..well, you can imagine the mess that comes from that.

However again, I can solve that in other ways. I guess the important thing is that, if we cannot get timely destruction (And I believe refcounting to be too high a price to pay for it) then it should be simple best-effort, get the destroy as close as reasonably practical to where it would normally be, and try and special-case resource contention to avoid the file-lock problem and equivalents.

I will consider further the problems involved in timely destruction. If I have any further ideas I'll let you know.


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: On timely destruction?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://193949]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-07-01 21:37 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (22 votes), past polls