Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re: I can't get no...

by Poetic Justice (Monk)
on Sep 17, 2002 at 16:01 UTC ( #198527=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to I can't get no...

I must agree that Perl is fun, but hardly satisfying. The Perl I write is used to assist me in managing a WAN that hosts a number of Data Warehouses. I can add users, groups, audit file permissions, web logs, event logs, search newsgroups, and filter my email all with perl. My sense of satisfaction comes from writing a program that does yet another of my many repetitive tasks. I code, run, occasionally refactor after reading a Perlmonks post that shows me "yet another way to do it", and derive my satisfaction from knowing that I'm getting lazier and lazier every day. My code is full of commented out lines that bear testimony to having found a better way, (or just sometimes a way that works), and I find that less than satisfying. I want to clean it up, but maybe I'll have to write "yet another program" to do just that.
Now that is satisfying.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://198527]
erix is not interested what the imbecile-in-chief has to say -- only what he will do
[GotToBTru]: that sounds fair to me
[davies]: I've just "approved" using syscalls in perl through inline c for at least the third time, but it still appears to me as unapproved. Is this just me?
[LanX]: erix: other side of the pond
[LanX]: davies: same problem
[Corion]: It had been approved as a Perl Monks Discussion. It should now be approvable into SoPW
[choroba]: Approved

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (16)
As of 2017-01-16 15:05 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you watch meteor showers?

    Results (151 votes). Check out past polls.