Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Re: •Re: Re: •Re: REALLY Private Methods in perl: Is Perl Flexible enough to be made Inflexible?

by Anonymous Monk
on Sep 23, 2002 at 22:59 UTC ( #200250=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to •Re: Re: •Re: REALLY Private Methods in perl: Is Perl Flexible enough to be made Inflexible?
in thread REALLY Private Methods in perl: Is Perl Flexible enough to be made Inflexible?

"If your boss/client is so pigheaded that they won't see your well-reasoned point, quit. Get another job." - while everything else is unworkable the way you say, unfortunately this also does not work (round here, anyway). In fact, you can't even get another job, while at the same time caving in makes you less marketable anyway. Pointy haired rules OK! PML.
  • Comment on Re: •Re: Re: •Re: REALLY Private Methods in perl: Is Perl Flexible enough to be made Inflexible?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://200250]
help
Chatterbox?
[MidLifeXis]: Has anyone been successful running prove under Windows with a --jobs parameter? It appears, even with (what appears to be) appropriately- configured parameters and up to date Test::Harness/TAP ::Harness that tests are still running serially.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2016-12-06 17:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    On a regular basis, I'm most likely to spy upon:













    Results (112 votes). Check out past polls.