Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

by shotgunefx (Parson)
on Sep 30, 2002 at 11:12 UTC ( #201677=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?
in thread chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

I don't know what the support for iframes is like now but you could make it an optional user setting. I bet you would still lighten a lot of load.

-Lee

"To be civilized is to deny one's nature."
  • Comment on Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?
by joe++ (Friar) on Sep 30, 2002 at 12:22 UTC
    IFRAME is part of canonical HTML since 4.0 and supported by MSIE and Mozilla for years. Shouldn't be much of a problem methinks!

    Added bonus: the main page loads independent of the scatterbox stuff, which could improve the overall (subjective) experience. ++BrowserUk.

    --
    Cheers, Joe

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://201677]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (16)
As of 2016-06-28 18:43 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My preferred method of making French fries (chips) is in a ...











    Results (360 votes). Check out past polls.