Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

by shotgunefx (Parson)
on Sep 30, 2002 at 11:12 UTC ( #201677=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?
in thread chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

I don't know what the support for iframes is like now but you could make it an optional user setting. I bet you would still lighten a lot of load.

-Lee

"To be civilized is to deny one's nature."


Comment on Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?
by joe++ (Friar) on Sep 30, 2002 at 12:22 UTC
    IFRAME is part of canonical HTML since 4.0 and supported by MSIE and Mozilla for years. Shouldn't be much of a problem methinks!

    Added bonus: the main page loads independent of the scatterbox stuff, which could improve the overall (subjective) experience. ++BrowserUk.

    --
    Cheers, Joe

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://201677]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (12)
As of 2015-07-29 01:11 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (260 votes), past polls