Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Joe
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

by shotgunefx (Parson)
on Sep 30, 2002 at 11:12 UTC ( #201677=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?
in thread chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?

I don't know what the support for iframes is like now but you could make it an optional user setting. I bet you would still lighten a lot of load.

-Lee

"To be civilized is to deny one's nature."


Comment on Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?
Re: Re: Re: chatterbox causes heavy load? So why don't switch to IRC?
by joe++ (Friar) on Sep 30, 2002 at 12:22 UTC
    IFRAME is part of canonical HTML since 4.0 and supported by MSIE and Mozilla for years. Shouldn't be much of a problem methinks!

    Added bonus: the main page loads independent of the scatterbox stuff, which could improve the overall (subjective) experience. ++BrowserUk.

    --
    Cheers, Joe

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://201677]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (14)
As of 2014-04-17 10:10 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (444 votes), past polls