Re: Possible first post syndrome remedy

[belg4mit]

in reply to Possible first post syndrome remedy

Sometimes those 3 responses are worded differently or take different approaches. In any event, I would venture that more often than not when this occurs the answer was already readily available. What's three more answers to a FAQ?

--
perl -wpe "s/\b;([mnst])/'$1/g"

[ignatz]

So true... within each response one can see a little window into the responders soul:

Angry monk:

Site How To The Old Perl Monks FAQ What makes a bad question? Before You Post ... How (Not) To Ask A Question How to RTFM How to ask questions the smart way

All forrest no trees monk:

use strict or die;

Curt monk:

see pacopod

I already asked that monk:

I already asked that here.

Too much time on his hands monk:

Here are several wonderful nodes on the subject by our beloved brother tilly that I have found useful.

No time on his hands monk:

Don't reinvent the wheel, use God::Paco from the CPAN.

Too helpful monk:

As you see in the code below, I've rewritten your regex and incorporated a rather interesting example of the Swartzian Transform. Also, I've made it object-oriented to improve readability.

Module monk:

I've written a module for this that I haven't published to the CPAN yet.

Column monk:

I've already written a column about that.

Benchmark monk:

Your solution is very slow compared to Perl's native paco function:

Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of paco, wako...
         paco:  4 secs ( 3.97 usr  0.01 sys =  3.98 cpu)
         wako:  6 secs ( 4.97 usr  0.00 sys =  4.97 cpu)

Einstein monk:

my $contextual = '(?:c(?:bex|e(?:bax|vpxf?)|hff(?:vrf|l)|vff(?:\\ gnxr
+|\\-gnxr|gnxr|r(?:ef|[feq])|vat|l)?)|dhvzf?|ebbg(?:r(?:ef|[eq])|vat|f
+)?|f(?:bq(?:q(?:rq|vat)|f)?|chax|perj(?:rq|vat|f)?|u(?:nt(?:t(?:r(?:e
+f|[qe])|vat)|f)?|vg(?:g(?:r(?:ef|[qe])|vat|l)|r(?:ef|[fqel])|vat|[fr]
+)?))|g(?:heqf?|jngf?|vgf?)|jnax(?:r(?:ef|[eq])|vat|f)?|n(?:ef(?:r(?:\
+\ ubyr|\\-ubyr|ubyr|[fq])|vat|r)|ff(?:\\ ubyrf?|\\-ubyrf?|rq|ubyrf?|v
+at))|o(?:ba(?:r(?:ef|[fe])|vat|r)|h(?:ttre|yy(?:\\ fuvg(?:g(?:r(?:ef|
+[qe])|vat)|f)?|\\-fuvg(?:g(?:r(?:ef|[qe])|vat)|f)?|fuvg(?:g(?:r(?:ef|
+[qe])|vat)|f)?))|n(?:paco|yy(?:r(?:ef|[qe])|vat|f)?)|yb(?:bql|j(?:\\ 
+wbof?|\\-wbof?|wbof?)))|p(?:bpx(?:\\ fhpx(?:ref?|vat)|\\-fhpx(?:ref?|
+vat)|fhpx(?:ref?|vat)|f)?|enc(?:c(?:r(?:ef|[eq])|vat|l)|f)?|h(?:agf?|
+z(?:vat|zvat|f)))|q(?:batf?|vpx(?:\\ urnq|\\-urnq|rq|urnq|vat|yrff|f)
+?)|s(?:hpx(?:rq|vat|f)?|neg(?:r[eq]|vat|[fl])?|rygpu(?:r(?:ef|[efq])|
+vat)?)|u(?:hzc(?:r(?:ef|[eq])|vat|f)?|n(?:eq[\\-\\ ]?ba|ys(?:\\ n[fe]
+|\\-n[fe]|n[fe])frq))|z(?:bgure(?:\\ shpx(?:ref?|vat)|\\-shpx(?:ref?|
+vat)|shpx(?:ref?|vat))|hgu(?:n(?:\\ shpx(?:ref?|vat|[nnn])|\\-shpx(?:
+ref?|vat|[nnn])|shpx(?:ref?|vat|[nnn]))|re(?:\\ shpx(?:ref?|vat)|\\-s
+hpx(?:ref?|vat)|shpx(?:ref?|vat)))|reqr?))';

(UPDATE: Fixed some thread display issues. Funny how an HTML definition list looks different in a thread than as a stand alone node.)

(UPDATE 2: Doing an XHTML version of a DL seems to fix the formatting on the different views (Thanks to Aristotle for the idea). Let me know if there are still problems. Also, how about golf monk? )

()-()
 \"/
  `

[sauoq]

What about Comedian monk?

++ BTW. :-)

-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";

[ccn]

Golf monk:


I've shorten your code to 13 strokes perl -0777pale '$_=@F'

Scoundrel anonymous monk:


merlyn sucks

[Wassercrats]

"merlyn sucks" would have been good for troll monk, but "Perl sucks" is better. I don't know why I couldn't think of a good troll monk one before.