Rendered by the New Chatterbox XML Ticker 1640936 2015-07-02 12:34:53 1435840493 Corion 5348 [jellisii2]: "Don't use vendor-provided stuff" ;-) But no, I'm not aware of good practices to clean up post-facto. I write a Makefile.PL nowadays just to list all prerequisites of my program/module <a href="?node=jellisii2">jellisii2</a>: "Don't use vendor-provided stuff" ;-) But no, I'm not aware of good practices to clean up post-facto. I write a Makefile.PL nowadays just to list all prerequisites of my program/module 1640937 2015-07-02 12:35:29 1435840529 Corion 5348 Even if I have no intention to ever "install" the app, fetching all prerequisites is just a <c>cpanm --installdeps .</c> away Even if I have no intention to ever "install" the app, fetching all prerequisites is just a <tt>cpanm --installdeps .</tt> away 1640938 2015-07-02 12:39:13 1435840753 marinersk 210889 No best practices here, either. Half-heartedly started to write a dependency scanner years ago but it never seems to bubble up from the Priority-3 tasks list. No best practices here, either. Half-heartedly started to write a dependency scanner years ago but it never seems to bubble up from the Priority-3 tasks list. 1640939 2015-07-02 12:39:37 1435840777 jellisii2 554517 I'm trying not to use vendor provided stuff... but in the past I always did. ;) I'm trying not to use vendor provided stuff... but in the past I always did. ;) 1640940 2015-07-02 12:39:54 1435840794 jellisii2 554517 I'm paying the cost for my past ignornace in time now. :D I'm paying the cost for my past ignornace in time now. :D 1640941 2015-07-02 12:40:17 1435840817 marinersk 210889 In theory, if you can count on reasonably consistent formatting, it wouldn't be hard to write a non-bulletproof audit scan script for use|require In theory, if you can count on reasonably consistent formatting, it wouldn't be hard to write a non-bulletproof audit scan script for use|require