Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Another consideration on considering

by RMGir (Prior)
on Oct 25, 2002 at 13:24 UTC ( #207986=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Another consideration on considering
in thread Another consideration on considering

Interesting idea... The problem is that you (or at least, I) can wind up missing changes like that in the XP nodelet, if you're clicking talk to send to the chatterbox, or you're previewing/posting a node, for instance.

I think the original suggestion was pretty good. If you haven't considered before (or even possibly frontpaged?), getting diverted to a page that refers to On Responsible Considerations or How do I moderate? (or Am I a power-mad Friar? :)) would not be a bad thing...

All we need now is to get a pmdev interested.
--
Mike


Comment on Re: Re: Another consideration on considering
Re^3: Another consideration on considering
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Oct 26, 2002 at 03:39 UTC
    I imagine it would be relatively difficult to fit into the XP nodelet code, where it doesn't really belong. A simple solution that addresses the elusiveness of the XP nodelet messages that should also be much easier to add somewhere: when you reach 490 XP, you get a root /msg saying something along the lines of the text that was proposed. That will probably also attract more attention, ie not be so prone to conditioned click-through-EULA reactions.

    Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://207986]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-12-25 22:31 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (163 votes), past polls