Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re: Re: Another consideration on considering

by RMGir (Prior)
on Oct 25, 2002 at 13:24 UTC ( #207986=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Another consideration on considering
in thread Another consideration on considering

Interesting idea... The problem is that you (or at least, I) can wind up missing changes like that in the XP nodelet, if you're clicking talk to send to the chatterbox, or you're previewing/posting a node, for instance.

I think the original suggestion was pretty good. If you haven't considered before (or even possibly frontpaged?), getting diverted to a page that refers to On Responsible Considerations or How do I moderate? (or Am I a power-mad Friar? :)) would not be a bad thing...

All we need now is to get a pmdev interested.

Comment on Re: Re: Another consideration on considering
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Another consideration on considering
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Oct 26, 2002 at 03:39 UTC
    I imagine it would be relatively difficult to fit into the XP nodelet code, where it doesn't really belong. A simple solution that addresses the elusiveness of the XP nodelet messages that should also be much easier to add somewhere: when you reach 490 XP, you get a root /msg saying something along the lines of the text that was proposed. That will probably also attract more attention, ie not be so prone to conditioned click-through-EULA reactions.

    Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://207986]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2015-11-27 04:20 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (717 votes), past polls