Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

RE: Higher level posts

by gaggio (Friar)
on Jul 07, 2000 at 17:45 UTC ( #21472=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Higher level posts

Yes, this is a good point.

Maybe that the current rating system should be a little reviewed. It does not mean that a newbye does not deserve getting points by asking questions, but I would simply add some "requirements" that would unify a little more the actual knowledge of the monks at each level. Just to point it out, a few days ago, a newbye was wondering how he could get Monk by simply voting and asking questions.

My propositions is to require postings that are not questions to go from a level to the upper level, and require also a number of reputation points that would increase along with the level.

Example:
  • to go from initiate to novice, require to have a post with +2 for reputation
  • to go to acolyte, two posts with +5 for reputations
  • etc.
  • and to get to the Saint status, having at least a post in each category with +50 or more for reputation (hey, not everybody could be a saint like that! :-)

    Otherwise, I am pleased with the current grading/XP system. I like the fact that you get XP just by logging on the site several times a day, because it proves that you are an "active monk".
  • Replies are listed 'Best First'.
    RE: RE: Higher level posts
    by ivory (Pilgrim) on Jul 31, 2000 at 12:58 UTC
      I don't agree with the idea of requiring posts with a certain rep to advance to the next level. We all know that there are problems with voting (people who vote randomly or against people they just don't like).

    Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Node Status?
    node history
    Node Type: note [id://21472]
    help
    Chatterbox?
    [choroba]: Most coffees? Depends on the country :-)
    [choroba]: oh, you mean a cup with no water.
    [Discipulus]: you are rigth, gory details but i remember from dunnowhere that concetrate caffein is more effective than brown water almost coffe..
    [LanX]: prepared both kinds a 100 times and thinks the amount of grind code is about the same
    Discipulus less effective i mean
    [LanX]: (french press vs espresso cooker )
    [LanX]: s/code/coffee/
    Discipulus progammer is an organism that transforms caffeine into software..

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others contemplating the Monastery: (5)
    As of 2017-01-16 10:59 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?
      Do you watch meteor showers?




      Results (148 votes). Check out past polls.