Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Ozymandias: Re: Suggestion for post-naming convention

by Ozymandias (Hermit)
on Jul 10, 2000 at 20:54 UTC ( #21820=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Suggestion for post-naming convention

Although this is a good idea, I think it'd be easier to use use node id's when linking to replies. It WOULD be nice if a square-bracket link could point to a node id, like this:

[node:21820|This node]
That'd be just as convenient for linking, and you wouldn't have to go back and change all your titles.

- Ozymandias

Update: kudra has made some updated suggestions on her home node, since root level nodes can't be edited (hint, hint).

After discussing it a little more with kudra, I find I misunderstood her intent; She's not proposing we all go back and change titles on existing nodes, she's suggesting we should change node titles on replies. She has a good point with that; I agree completely. To prove it, I'm going to change the title of this reply. <G>


Comment on Ozymandias: Re: Suggestion for post-naming convention
Download Code
RE: Ozymandias: Re: Suggestion for post-naming convention
by Russ (Deacon) on Jul 10, 2000 at 23:20 UTC
    You can point to a specific node in square brackets...
    [id://10195|Russ' Home Node]
    results in Russ' Home Node

    Russ

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://21820]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-07-03 03:46 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (48 votes), past polls