Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re: Re: NO PERL 6

by Louis_Wu (Chaplain)
on Dec 09, 2002 at 02:15 UTC ( #218431=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: NO PERL 6
in thread NO PERL 6

I prefer Perl 1. It's like comparing New Coke and Original Coke. The new recipe wasn't popular, and they had to go back to the old version. Maybe that's what the Perl community should be doing.


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: NO PERL 6
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Dec 12, 2002 at 22:20 UTC
    What do you find appealing about Perl 1?
      Perl 1 is the original. The first is always the best. Example: the Men of Middle Earth aren't thought very highly of, unless they are directly descended from the originals, the Neumenor's. All peoples of Middle Earth think that the first Kings were the greatest of all Men. In much the same way, the farther we get from Perl 1, the more diluted the language becomes, and we all know that dilution is bad. That is the basis for my objection to Perl 6.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://218431]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (6)
As of 2018-05-22 18:00 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?