in reply to Re: Re: Class::InsideOut - yet another riff on inside out objects.
in thread Class::InsideOut - yet another riff on inside out objects.
Well, the point is twofold:
- Most importantly, we need a way for a generic DESTROY to work.
- Ideally we wouldn't have to name the the field more than once and only once.
Makeshifts last the longest.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re^3: Class::InsideOut - yet another riff on inside out objects.
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Dec 20, 2002 at 00:33 UTC |
In Section
Meditations