Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: RFC: Class::Proxy::MethodChain

by Aristotle (Chancellor)
on Feb 26, 2003 at 07:09 UTC ( #238680=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: RFC: Class::Proxy::MethodChain
in thread RFC: Class::Proxy::MethodChain

The point of writing that function was that using map makes it read out of order - the new is at the bottom. Reversing the arguments on for_obj makes it practically the same thing as map so I would just stick with that one then.

Makeshifts last the longest.


Comment on Re^3: RFC: Class::Proxy::MethodChain
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: Class::Proxy::MethodChain
by adrianh (Chancellor) on Feb 26, 2003 at 10:29 UTC

    Order is relative. Since everything else in perl that applies something to something else has the application block first that way reads more naturally to me in perl.

    To-mah-to. To-may-to. :-)

    Roll on perl6. With ~> and <~ and we can both be happy :-)

      Guess there's points to be made for either choice. It seems to be a matter largely of choosing between clear but verbose and concise but less obvious approaches.. the question is when verbosity detracts from clarity and when not - a choice that's probably going to be taken differently by every programmer. Well, given Perl 6 (pun intended), we won't have to choose.. now if only it was here.

      Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://238680]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (12)
As of 2015-07-29 20:55 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (269 votes), past polls