Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Delete

by NodeReaper (Curate)
on Jul 25, 2000 at 00:31 UTC ( #24177=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Answer: How do I use IPX
in thread network programming


Reason: (Nitsuj) It asked to be deleted

For more information on this node visit: this


Comment on Delete
RE: (2) How do I use IPX (spell it EYE-PEE)
by ybiC (Prior) on Jul 28, 2000 at 04:59 UTC
    IPX/SPX and SMB(NetBT) have historically been easier to use from a client standpoint. Outside of medium-to-small LANs, however, the unavoidable broadcast traffic of either takes it's toll.

    Unix-style TCP/IP networking, on the other hand, wastes faaarr less bandwidth on broadcasts, and with Dynamic DNS (DNS+DHCP), client configuration can be just as simple.

    From a routing standpoint, IP is sooo much better supported than IPX.   If you want to do routed SMB, it has to encapsulated in, you guessed it, IP.   But you still have to deal with WINS and excessive broadcasts.   IPX RIP doesn't scale well, and NLSP is convoluted.   If you're lucky enough to support Cisco gear, EIGRP is a nearly ideal Interior Gateway Protocol for IP in even multi-hundred site WANs.   If you have Bay/Nortel routers, you can still get by with OSPF to avoid IP RIP1.

    Mind you, I've got nothing against NetWare, I just dislike supporting IPX/SPX in WANs and large LANs.

    My professional opinions, worth exactly what you paid for them. <grin>
    Oposing opinions get equal airtime, under Federal Campaign Reform Law.
        and what's this got to do with Perl?
        <still grinning>     ybiC

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://24177]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-07-28 07:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (193 votes), past polls