Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: (A6) Perl 6, a general-purpose language?

by pdcawley (Hermit)
on Mar 11, 2003 at 10:34 UTC ( #241989=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to (A6) Perl 6, a general-purpose language?

I have the feeling that I'm going to be repeating this for some time to come...

There is a very important distinction to be drawn between typed values and typed variables. C only has typed variables; you can't look at an arbitrary C value and know its type. You can do this in Perl, that's what bless and friends are for. In Perl 6 we'll be getting a richer set of value types out of the box and I applaud that. We're also getting typed variables in Perl 6, and that's good too, for several different reasons:

  • You will be able to define 'struct' in Perl that matches an equivalent C struct, which makes life so much easier for 'Glue' writers.
  • If you want it (and I can't imagine why you would) you can go the whole bondage and discipline route and adopt strict typing throughout your code.
  • Optimizers can make use of type declarations to improve performance, so you can opt to take B&D flexibility hit only in your inner loops (or at other points where a profiler shows you have speed issues)
Perl 6 also introduces a concept that I'll call, for the nonce, 'storage typing', which allows you to specify that a particular variable that looks like, say, a Scalar, is actually implemented by some arbitrary type that responds to the same interface as a Perl Scalar. This looks like being Perl 6's replacement for tying, and very nice it looks too.
  • Comment on Re: (A6) Perl 6, a general-purpose language?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://241989]
help
Chatterbox?
[LanX]: I told you the story about the “new" currency trading system of Dresdner Bank
[LanX]: ?
[Corion]: No, or I don't remember the story ;)
LanX my favourite don't tell me the proof of concept is good enough for production anecdote
[ambrus]: ah, it's one of thos
[Eily]: what, there's a difference between proof of concept and production?
[LanX]: 20 years ago traders were complaining about the latency of the trading system...
[ambrus]: I'm currently in the process of rewriting my proof of concept programs. They sort of developped organically as I was experimenting, so now I've got an ugly mess of multiple programs and one-liners held together by nothing. I'll have to rewrite them to som
[ambrus]: ething that's both cleanly organized and mostly automated.
LanX in train, bad connection

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (15)
As of 2017-03-29 11:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?



    Results (350 votes). Check out past polls.