Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: is it irreversible

by kodo (Hermit)
on Mar 14, 2003 at 13:44 UTC ( #243026=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: is it irreversible
in thread Here is a commercial obfuscator

Uhm well they want 1879$ for that tool. Really funny I guess you won't need more than some hours to write something much more obfuscating.
Just rename all vars back to something more readable like $var_1 etc, and it's pretty readable I think.
Of course it makes it a bit more hard to study the code but it's definitly not even worth 100$.

kodo (http://kodo.me.uk)


Comment on Re: Re: is it irreversible
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: is it irreversible
by diotalevi (Canon) on Mar 14, 2003 at 14:00 UTC

    I guess that depends on whether you put a dollar value on the time it takes to write that - I suppose the 1K-2K price might be reasonable if the perl programmer is somehow braindead and it'd take a long time to write (more than a few hours) or if the programmer has a high value at which point either something obvious and simple will arise or its just worth the money to buy a license.

    Just keep in mind through all this that there are other considerations outside of mere price tag.


    Seeking Green geeks in Minnesota

Re: Re: Re: is it irreversible
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 14, 2003 at 14:19 UTC
    I guess the development of this suite took more than a couple of weeks. So the price may look perfectly justified for some.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://243026]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (20)
As of 2015-07-31 15:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (278 votes), past polls