Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects

by Abigail-II (Bishop)
on Apr 02, 2003 at 16:34 UTC ( #247521=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re5: Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects
in thread Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects

I don't know about your coding style, but I prefer to use namespaces and lexically scoped variables, to avoid ACCIDENTAL cluttering of values.

But I concur. The entire concept of namespaces and lexical variables is just stupid. We should just put all our variables and subs in the main namespace.

Abigail

  • Comment on Re: Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://247521]
help
Chatterbox?
[ww]: er -- senior cognitive deficiency: ((22+(22*2))
[ww]: (but pls don't s/senior/senile/ ... not yet
[karlgoethebier]: A bit more audience now: The Impact of Information Sources on Code Security Very interesting IMHO...
[karlgoethebier]: ..it's about copy & paste ;-)
[ww]: Wonder what IEEE would have thought w/survey based on PM/perl
[ww]: s/thought/found/
[erix]: that title is a broken* sentence, no? But maybe that's deliberate
[karlgoethebier]: ww:My first thought, to be honest...
[erix]: and those authors' names don't look like native english speakers. Then again, neither am I :)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-09-25 14:43 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    During the recent solar eclipse, I:









    Results (280 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?