Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects

by Abigail-II (Bishop)
on Apr 02, 2003 at 16:34 UTC ( #247521=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re5: Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects
in thread Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects

I don't know about your coding style, but I prefer to use namespaces and lexically scoped variables, to avoid ACCIDENTAL cluttering of values.

But I concur. The entire concept of namespaces and lexical variables is just stupid. We should just put all our variables and subs in the main namespace.

Abigail


Comment on Re: Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://247521]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (8)
As of 2015-07-06 05:58 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (70 votes), past polls