Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects

by Abigail-II (Bishop)
on Apr 02, 2003 at 16:34 UTC ( #247521=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re5: Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects
in thread Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects

I don't know about your coding style, but I prefer to use namespaces and lexically scoped variables, to avoid ACCIDENTAL cluttering of values.

But I concur. The entire concept of namespaces and lexical variables is just stupid. We should just put all our variables and subs in the main namespace.

Abigail


Comment on Re: Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://247521]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-05-23 16:27 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    In my home, the TV remote control is ...









    Results (467 votes), past polls