Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Fun with Typed Objects 1

by erikharrison (Deacon)
on Apr 03, 2003 at 06:07 UTC ( #247688=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Fun with Typed Objects 1

Actually, there was some talk of a solution to this. It works in this, somewhat handwavy way.

The declaration my Dog $spot is not enough to instantiate the object itself. After all, you might want my Dog $spot = new Poodle.

But it might be enough typing to allow you to call Dog class methods on it, assuming that it is still undef. Which ties in with a somewhat bizzare use of an augmented assignment operators for the method call operator . resulting in  my Dog $spot .= new (name=>"Fido");

I could live with that . . .

Cheers,
Erik

Light a man a fire, he's warm for a day. Catch a man on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchet


Comment on Re: Fun with Typed Objects 1
Select or Download Code
Re: Re: Fun with Typed Objects 1
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Apr 03, 2003 at 16:08 UTC
    I like the way that is going. I thought about class methods after reading Aristotle's post. I think what you describe is very well defined, too: the .= notation means to use the declared type of a variable and call a class method. To prevent surprises in a more general use, perhaps .= should use the actual object if it exists, but allow undef value to pull the declared type.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://247688]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-07-05 21:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (68 votes), past polls