Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: Make Supersearch more obvious

by atl (Pilgrim)
on Jul 31, 2000 at 14:42 UTC ( #25233=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: Make Supersearch more obvious
in thread Make Supersearch more obvious

On a first glance I'd say yes, it's unfair that I can give a good node and an excellent node only the same vote-up.

But there might be a problem when it comes to flame threads, and god knows this site has some (I have only the link to this one handy, but there are more). Consider what might be going on if some monks might start a showdown with their votes ...

No offence meant to anyone!

It's just that one man one vote is ok, in my own humble opinion.

Andreas

P.S.: No objections against kudra's suggestion. I agree.


Comment on RE: RE: Make Supersearch more obvious

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://25233]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-07-26 09:08 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (175 votes), past polls