Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Are "PM Discussions" only to be technical?

by tilly (Archbishop)
on May 01, 2003 at 18:28 UTC ( #254760=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Are "PM Discussions" only to be technical?

So I am a feature and not a bug? Cool!

Wait, you said *almost* a feature. Which means that I am a bug until I get a little more seniority...dang...

FWIW my thinking is that Discussion should be about the site, both technical and desired behaviour, and Meditations works for pretty much anything that makes people think which doesn't specifically belong anywhere else. Therefore I would have said that the node about me should be in Meditations, not in Discussion (and did put my return post there). Otherwise I mostly agree with your suggested classifications of various nodes.


Comment on Re: Are "PM Discussions" only to be technical?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://254760]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-07-22 22:43 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (130 votes), past polls