Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: (Ozymandias) RE: RE: Proposed XP System Changes

by mikfire (Deacon)
on Aug 04, 2000 at 00:38 UTC ( #26089=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: (Ozymandias) RE: RE: Proposed XP System Changes
in thread Proposed XP System Changes

Votes do affect XP. The voter still draws a bonus for casting a vote until they reach monk level. The votee gets an XP bonus from the cast vote no matter what level the votee is at.

I cannot speak for other monks. I do not look at who wrote the article when I read it or when I vote. I vote on the article based on a couple of really simple criteria, based on where it is in the Monestary.

I vote for a question in Q&A or SoPW if the question makes me think "Hmm, how does that work?" or if I recognize it as a problem I have had and really had to slave out of it.

I vote for answers if they are clear, precise and are of a "good" tone. I also like answers that address larger issues and try to answer even the unasked questions.

Most everywhere else, I vote for an article if it makes me laugh. I vote for an article if it is well written and makes me think a bit.

Nowhere in my system do I care who wrote it.

I am sorry if we miss the shy people. They are important to this site. I am not sorry if we miss Larry Wall incognito, cause that is what he wants - by the very definition of the word incognito. I feel that allowing karma whores and the whole slashdot thing is more dangerous than missing the shy people.

Make your proposal. The goals are to encourage and increase the reward for particpating, to keep the signal/noise ratio high and make the levels somewhat indicative of how much a monk has given to the community. vroom reads this stuff. If it is a good idea, he will think about it.

I can't speak to the missed articles, cause I have a fair number that received nowhere near the number of votes they should have as well.

mikfire


Comment on RE: RE: (Ozymandias) RE: RE: Proposed XP System Changes
RE: RE: RE: (Ozymandias) RE: RE: Proposed XP System Changes
by Nitsuj (Hermit) on Aug 04, 2000 at 00:43 UTC
    Whoa.

    I like the new system, as it was implemented. It was too easy to aquire status before, by just voting.

    I have only been posting for a month or so now, so I certainly don't deserve high rank yet.

    I was just saying that voting is important as well. Some people were saying that it should be taken out entirely. I was merely stating my opinion on the matter, not condemning anyone elses.

    Oh yeah, I meant to mention, I know that MY PERSONAL system of voting is guilty of favoritism towards those that I know, but not on purpose.

    In this order, I read
    1) Stuff people I chat with wrote
    2) Newest Nodes
    3) Questions

    Just out of personal interest.
    1) I want to know what my friends are up to
    2) I want the news
    3) I like to help

    and that's pretty much the order that they occur to me in. I know that PERSONALLY I am guilty in that such a system causes me to have to reevaluate how I use my votes, since typically, I blow them all like a kid with change in his pocket (OOOHHH, that's funny, OOOH, that's smart), and then I run out of votes in the afternoon, after lunch and my coffee is all gone, when I am saying, "DOH! I wish that I could vote this up. I'll have to tommorow." And then tommorow comes, and I burn up my votes, and it repeats.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://26089]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (4)
As of 2014-07-23 04:24 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (133 votes), past polls