Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Best way to do distributed development discussion

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on May 30, 2003 at 20:37 UTC ( #261936=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Best way to do distributed development discussion
in thread Perl 6 feature that scares me the most:

Fair enough. It's JARA! (Just another religious argument) -- like emacs -v- vi etc. etc. -- and I'm on the wrong side of it:) I'll live with it.

Thanks for the feedback.


Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller



Comment on Re: Re: Re: Best way to do distributed development discussion
Re^4: Best way to do distributed development discussion (webforums--)
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on May 30, 2003 at 20:52 UTC

    FWIW I agree with the man here.. and personally I like mailing lists. Also, although of course it's not necessary to send a copy of each message to everyone, you also end up send a lot of (ephemeral) copies for display to a web forum's participants.

    Really what we need is a New And Improved version of NNTP.

    Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://261936]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-07-07 09:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (88 votes), past polls