Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks DiBona
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

RE: plus and minus votes (encourage controversy?)

by ybiC (Prior)
on Aug 05, 2000 at 01:18 UTC ( #26272=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to plus and minus votes
in thread Proposed XP System Changes

As an incurable stats fiend, my first thought was "Cool, more stats!"

But on second thought, do we really want to encourage controversy by publicly quantifying it?   There will always be disagreements and that's truly A Good Thing(TM), but I could do without a Most Controversial Nodes node.

Update: s/encourage controversy/encourage more controversy/
inspired by atl's thoughts below

Update 2: I do agree with tye who suggested above that each Monk might benefit from seeing the swing on his/her own nodes.
    cheers,
    ybiC


Comment on RE: plus and minus votes (encourage controversy?)
RE: RE: plus and minus votes (encourage controversy?)
by atl (Pilgrim) on Aug 05, 2000 at 01:39 UTC
    Well, not more or less than already encouraged by displaying the reputation totals. But I think there are a lot more stats and information junkies online here ;-).

    Just my two cents ...

    Andreas

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://26272]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (12)
As of 2014-04-17 19:27 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (454 votes), past polls