Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Perl 6: Will we use it?

by kutsu (Priest)
on Jun 06, 2003 at 16:52 UTC ( #263767=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Perl 6: Will we use it?

I voted Lalalalalala, I can't hear you..., mainly because I'm not looking forward to Perl 6. Not to say I'm not going to use it, but I still have enough going on with Perl 5 that I won't be using it anytime soon. Most likely, I'll get a Camel that explains the new features and slowly, like a year or two later, move to Perl 6.

Updated: changed book to Camel after reading Mr. Muskrat's post

"Pain is weakness leaving the body, I find myself in pain everyday" -me


Comment on Re: Perl 6: Will we use it?
Re: Re: Perl 6: Will we use it?
by Nkuvu (Priest) on Jun 06, 2003 at 18:05 UTC

    I'm in a similar boat. My Perl looks like C, and I rarely use the higher level capabilities of Perl. So I really haven't run into anything that needs improvement in Perl. Maybe as I progress in my Perl skills I'll find out what everyone's talking about with threading and OO and all that fun stuff.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://263767]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-12-21 02:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (101 votes), past polls