Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Perl 6: Will we use it?

by kutsu (Priest)
on Jun 06, 2003 at 16:52 UTC ( #263767=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Perl 6: Will we use it?

I voted Lalalalalala, I can't hear you..., mainly because I'm not looking forward to Perl 6. Not to say I'm not going to use it, but I still have enough going on with Perl 5 that I won't be using it anytime soon. Most likely, I'll get a Camel that explains the new features and slowly, like a year or two later, move to Perl 6.

Updated: changed book to Camel after reading Mr. Muskrat's post

"Pain is weakness leaving the body, I find myself in pain everyday" -me


Comment on Re: Perl 6: Will we use it?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Perl 6: Will we use it?
by Nkuvu (Priest) on Jun 06, 2003 at 18:05 UTC

    I'm in a similar boat. My Perl looks like C, and I rarely use the higher level capabilities of Perl. So I really haven't run into anything that needs improvement in Perl. Maybe as I progress in my Perl skills I'll find out what everyone's talking about with threading and OO and all that fun stuff.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://263767]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-07-29 18:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (267 votes), past polls