Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Macros, LFSPs and LFMs

by chromatic (Archbishop)
on Jun 11, 2003 at 17:19 UTC ( #265103=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Macros, LFSPs and LFMs

everyone can read a Java program and understand what is going on

Untrue, unless you're denying the existence of non-programmers or programmers who don't know OOP or programmers who've never worked with an Algol-derived syntax.

I've said before that the notion that "the simpler the syntax, the more readable the code" is a false dilemma. You'll have complexity somewhere else. I don't care if a non-programmer can't read my code. I care if a decent Perl programmer can maintain my Perl code. I care if a decent C programmer can maintain my C code. I care if a decent Ruby programmer can maintain my Ruby code.

Bring on macros! I'll use them to simplify my code as a whole. If I use them wisely, they'll make it easier to understand and maintain.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://265103]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2016-10-01 19:35 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?






    Results (6 votes). Check out past polls.