Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number

Re: Re: Any news on Compress::LZW?

by diotalevi (Canon)
on Jun 19, 2003 at 03:32 UTC ( #267070=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Any news on Compress::LZW?
in thread Any news on Compress::LZW?

I'd have done this myself if I didn't already know that there might be good ways to cheat and get better performance on memory, cpu or on the API. I really wanted SomeGuru to pick it up. *shrug* Having the original paper around would be pretty handy as well.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Any news on Compress::LZW?
by meredith (Friar) on Jun 19, 2003 at 12:05 UTC
    SomeGuru, eh? Don't know him. :) Actually, I looked at the code (dont tell:) and it's just the LZW algorithm in perl... it doesn't output in any sort of data format, so there's work to be done there, and it doesn't have a decompressor (likely because there is no set data format :). I'm going to poke around some more on the subject... I'll also look at that Compress::SelfExtracting to see if the LZW can be isolated (and optimized, if it really is dog-slow).

    Update: I've pulled the compression code out of Compress::SelfExtracting. It's working perfectly... got a 2.91:1 compression on a text file I had laying around :) We'll see if the author cares about his code being repackaged :)

    mhoward - at -

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://267070]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (2)
As of 2018-01-20 05:24 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?

    Results (226 votes). Check out past polls.