Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask

RE: RE: Limit on voting down a person

by chromatic (Archbishop)
on Aug 10, 2000 at 06:08 UTC ( #27232=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to RE: Limit on voting down a person
in thread Limit on voting down a person

That's a possibility, but consider the amount of time it would take to do that. Someone with that much of a vendetta and that much spare time probably knows better ways to harass someone than by voting down posts on PM.

I think self-regulation is, as usual, a pretty good solution. I regularly hit Worst Nodes and bump up stuff that doesn't deserve more than -1 or 0. There's three or four posts of that kind every day (depending on your criteria), so higher-level monks interested in keeping the peace would do well to spend a few votes there.

Comment on RE: RE: Limit on voting down a person
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: Limit on voting down a person
by t0mas (Priest) on Aug 10, 2000 at 10:42 UTC
    You are right of cause. It would take time and energy to do such a thing. I just tried to point out the diffrence between a person and a PM login.

    I share your view that self-regulation is a good solution and I also think that higher-level monks (or any other old-timers who vaules this site) can take on that responsibilty. Maybe then, we will not have this types of discussions all the time as more and more new users register.

    /brother t0mas

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://27232]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-12-01 08:27 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (796 votes), past polls