Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: The Evil Pleasures of Unit Tests

by Steve_p (Priest)
on Sep 03, 2003 at 16:50 UTC ( #288674=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to The Evil Pleasures of Unit Tests

I, for one, see nothing wrong or evil about this. I believe that I remember reading something similar to this on Joel On Software. His take was that you should bury poor programmers on your team with bug reports. The result is that they will either improve or leave.

Also, regarding some of the other comments above, just because someone is on your team doesn't mean they should not be held responsible for the problems they cause. Adding additional tests is somewhat of a backdoor way of making them responsible, but, if all else fails, I'd think it is a very appropriate way to get someone's attention to their poor code.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://288674]
help
Chatterbox?
[karlgoethebier]: Good morning
[Discipulus]: hello karlgoethebier, what about your nigth guitar performance?
[marto]: people have the option to easily ignore/hide sigs. I don't think it's any real cause for concern. If something were overly offensive I'd hope it'd get reported and discussed
[Discipulus]: some monk felt offended or alike..
[marto]: I saw, but I didn't see any justification
[marto]: no rude words were used, no name calling
[karlgoethebier]: Discipulus: Still got the blues

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (8)
As of 2017-06-23 08:32 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?















    Results (538 votes). Check out past polls.